Tongues & the False Spirits in the Church.
We have come to the most interesting study I have done after end time prophecy of course. The speaking in tongues (languages) vs the babble you hear now a days in modern churches. I am so baffled to see this evil spirit of paganism permeating the body of Christ. We are ushering in this pagan babble speaking spirit right along the kundalini spirit. These two spirits brothers and sisters, go hand in hand. Just to give you a little background and history, the Hindu religion practices “being slain in the spirit and they claim to speak in tongues (babble)” I have seen the manifestation videos for myself . You simply can’t reconcile speaking some babble with “the outpouring of the spirit of God” and hindus experiencing the same “outpour”. This is blasphemy! If you speak in tongues (babble) or believe is is the real gift, I must warn you as a watchman on the wall…please be very careful and diligent in your study on this matter. This is a false spirit (of satan) invading the church. This is a counterfeit gift, everything satan does is to counterfeit the real gifts of God in this case the gift of tongues ( known languages). We are going to go over history and the Logos. What does the Bible say the gift of tongues really is? Does the Bible describe what the gift is? Or does it leave it to us to interpret what the gift is? Let’s start with a popular story in genesis, Babel.
Genesis 11 ~ Universal Language, Babel, Confusion
1Now the whole earth used the same language and the same words. 2It came about as they journeyed east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. 3They said to one another, “Come, let us make bricks and burn them thoroughly.” And they used brick for stone, and they used tar for mortar. 4They said, “Come, let us build for ourselves a city, and a tower whose top will reach into heaven, and let us make for ourselves a name, otherwise we will be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.” 5The LORD came down to see the city and the tower which the sons of men had built. 6The LORD said, “Behold, they are one people, and they all have the same language. And this is what they began to do, and now nothing which they purpose to do will be impossible for them. 7“Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, so that they will not understand one another’s speech.” 8So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of the whole earth; and they stopped building the city. 9Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of the whole earth; and from there the LORD scattered them abroad over the face of the whole earth.
The Day of Pentecost
1When the day of Pentecost had come, they were all together in one place. 2And suddenly there came from heaven a noise like a violent rushing wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting. 3And there appeared to them tongues as of fire distributing themselves, and they rested on each one of them. 4And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit was giving them utterance. 5Now there were Jews living in Jerusalem, devout men from every nation under heaven. 6And when this sound occurred, the crowd came together, and were bewildered because each one of them was hearing them speak in his own language. 7They were amazed and astonished, saying, “Why, are not all these who are speaking Galileans? 8“And how is it that we each hear them in our own language to which we were born? 9“Parthians and Medes and Elamites, and residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, 10Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the districts of Libya around Cyrene, and visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, 11Cretans and Arabs—we hear them in our own tongues speaking of the mighty deeds of God.” 12And they all continued in amazement and great perplexity, saying to one another, “What does this mean?” 13But others were mocking and saying, “They are full of sweet wine.” ( I added the emphasis and Italics to make a point).
Now let’s go over this very carefully because the whole doctrine of the gift of tongues hangs on this chapter due to the fact it clearly explains what the real gift is. Now the people who were gathered there on pentecost spoke all different languages as you can see by the bible pointing out the various places they were from. In all of those places the language was different. The story behind the question they asked about the apostles being Galileans is that men from Galilee were usually fishermen and uneducated men. So they were astonished that they would speak in their own language without going to school, meaning being the lowest of the low.
“And how is it that we each hear them in our own language to which we were born? ” Now friends is this is not clear to you nothing will ever be! Does this sound like babble to you? All those people from all those diverse countries, speaking their native language understood the apostles in their own language. You mean in their babble? NO! In their native language! You can’t find one country in the world who’s native language is some babble they don’t even understand.
Rhajajahjhjh yrtgeihdin hfidhfdshfk…..so brother what are you saying? I don’t know, it’s a language I don’t understand. God would make a language you can’t understand in order for you to talk to Him for your own benefit (for no-one is benefited or a church edified by it) and to top it off give that gift to the Hindu’s as well. WOW! Some people need to get in the Word! That belief is such nonsense!
So wait a minute?!!!! Why was Jesus NEVER, I say NEVER recorded speaking babble, after being baptized, praying in the garden etc??? Yea makes you wonder huh? If this was such a sign of the outpouring of the Holy Ghost wouldn’t the Messiah have this gift? After all he did miracles and wonders…he just didn’t speak in babble-ish. 🙂
Let’s move on to the history of what was truly going on in the Corinthian church. We must first understand what was going on that we can see why Paul wrote some of the things he wrote in his letters to the Corinthians.
The Corinthians had counterfeited the real gift of tongues and substituted an ecstatic kind of speech that was very common in pagan religions.
The Corinthian Background of Tongues
THE INFILTRATION OF CORINTH INTO THE CHURCH
The Corinthian church had allowed the entire world system in which they existed to infiltrate their assembly. For example, they were emphasizing human philosophies (chapters 1-4), they had a hero worship cult (chapter 3), they were involved in terrible, gross, sexual immorality (chapters 5-6), they were suing each other in court (chapter 6), they had misevaluated their home and marriage relationships (chapter 7), they were confused about pagan feasts, idolatry, and things offered to idols (chapters 8-10), they had relinquished the proper place of women in the church (chapter 11), they had misunderstood the whole dimension of spiritual gifts (chapter 12), and they had lost hold of the one great thing–love (chapter 13).
You see, they had let the satanic system that existed in their society infiltrate the church. And with it came the pagan religious practices–with all of the ecstasies, eroticisms, and sensualities. The Corinthians accepted it all, creating a confused amalgamation of truth and error.
THE INVOLVEMENT OF TONGUES IN PAGANISM
The Ecstasy of the Greco-Roman World
At the time of the Corinthian church, the Greco-Roman world had a multitude of gods. In their worship of these gods, it was very common for a person to go into ecstasy, which literally means “to go out of oneself.” They would go into an unconscious state where all kinds of psychic phenomena would occur. They believed that when they were in an ecstatic trance, they actually left their body, ascended into space, connected up to whatever deity they were worshiping, and would begin to commune with that deity. Once they began to commune with that deity, they would begin to speak the language of the gods. This was a very common practice in their culture. In fact, the term used in 1 Corinthians to refer to speaking in tongues (glossais lalein) was not invented by Bible writers. It was a term used commonly in the Greco-Roman culture to speak of the pagan language of the gods which occurred while the speaker was in an ecstatic trance. By the way, this language of the gods was always gibberish.
The Eros of the Greek World
The Greeks had a word for this ecstatic religious experience. It was the word eros. Sometimes translated as sensual love, the word eros had a broader meaning. It meant “the desire for the sensual,” or “the desire for the erotic,” or “the desire for ecstasy,” or “the desire for the ultimate experience or feeling.” Their religion, then, was an erotic, sensual, ecstatic religion– designed to be felt. In fact, when people went to their various temples to worship, they would actually enter into orgies with the temple priestesses. So the erotic, sexual, sensual, ecstatic religion was all rolled into one big ball along with the gibberish of divine utterances. And these mystery religions, which had been spawned in Babylon, had found their way into the Corinthian society…and the church.
The Charismatic Reproduction of Corinth
I’m afraid that what has happened today in the Charismatic movement is just a reproduction of exactly what happened in Corinth. Because of a deadness in the church, because of years of ignorance of the true work of the Holy Spirit, because of a lack of good Bible teaching, and because of the dearth of anything really significant going on in the church, people in the church began to reach out to feel God and to sense His reality. Well, that just paved the way for Satan’s counterfeit to come flooding in. As in Corinth, the Charismatic movement has married the system of pagan religion with Christianity. They have developed a sensual, feeling-oriented, experiential, erotic kind of approach to Christianity, and call it the work of the Holy Spirit. However, it is most likely the counterfeit of Satan.
Confessions of a Pentecostal
In his book Spirit Manifestations and the Gift of Tongues, Sir Robert Anderson quotes from a pamphlet written by a former leader of the Pentecostal movement in India:
“Finally, I went to the mission at 328 W. 63rd St., Chicago asking only one question, `Why do I not receive the baptism? What is the matter with me?’ The good friends prayed with me and said that nothing was wrong, I only needed to wait.
“Praise the Lord they were right. For the first time I knelt at the altar on Sunday afternoon, March 17, the power began to seize me and I laughed all through the following communion service. In the evening about 11 p.m., I knelt with a few of the friends praying for me (Elder S– placed his hands on my head for a short time, several times during the afternoon and evening). After some little waiting I began to laugh, or rather my body was used to laugh with increasing power until I was flat on my back laughing at the top of my voice for over half an hour. On rising, I found that I was drunk on the new wine, acting just like a drunken man in many ways and full of joy. On kneeling to meet the Lord again, I was suddenly seized with an irresistible power of beseechings with groanings that could not be uttered, asking the Lord to have mercy on me a sinner, and telling Him that I wanted to go all the way with Him. The power of this praying was too great for me to endure, and suddenly my eyes opened to see Elder S–, who had been standing a few feet distant, fall as though he had been struck. I was relieved, and in a few seconds was straight up in the air shouting, `Glory!’ at the top of my voice. Again kneeling, my eyes grew dark, and I was rolled over onto the floor, lying there for some time nearly unconscious. Then coming to and kneeling, I felt my jaws and mouth being worked by a strange force. In a few seconds, some baby gibberish was uttered, then a few words in Chinese that I understood, and then several sentences in a strange tongue. This turned into singing, and I did not again speak in tongues until Wednesday, three days later.”
Now, what is going on there? All kinds of experiences that are based on feelings and emotion–experiences that are apprehended by the senses rather than the mind. Well, these kind of experiences were common to pagan religions–not Christianity! For example, Plato, who lived from 429-347 B.C., wrote page after page in his Dialogues describing pagan ecstasies of speech. This was not anything that belonged to Christianity. The true gift of languages in Christianity was only used when somebody who spoke the language was present in order that it might be a sign that God was there and that God’s people were speaking God’s truth. Never was it intended to be confused with paganism.
The Counterfeit Activity of Satan
Whenever God does something, Satan tries to counterfeit it, doesn’t he? Well, to cloud the true revelatory work of the Holy Spirit in the early church, Satan put up a smokescreen that consisted of phony revelations, phony visions, and phony tongues. That’s why the Apostle John said that when somebody comes along and starts telling you they speak for God, you’d better “test the spirits whether they are of God” (1 Jn. 4:1). It’s easy to fall prey to the phony. And because the Corinthians had decided to marry the spirit of the age, they became victims.
Now remember, Satan is called “the god of this age” (2 Cor. 4:4) and “the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience” (Eph. 2:2b). Satan not only wants to be like God (Isa. 14:12-14), he appears “transformed into an angel of light” (2 Cor. 11:14). He wants to counterfeit reality and trick the church into accepting that which is phony. That’s his business!
In Corinth, the counterfeit practices of heathenism had engulfed the church. I’m afraid the same thing is happening today. Those kind of ecstatic, sensual, feeling-oriented experiences, however, are never associated in the New Testament with the true work of the Holy Spirit…never! In fact, in 1 Corinthians 14:32, Paul says, “And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.” In other words, nobody is ever to give up his spirit or lose control of himself. At the end of chapter 14, Paul’s final word on this subject was, “Let all things be done decently and in order.” It’s not the Holy Spirit’s way to have a worship service where everybody jumps up with their own psalm, doctrine, tongue, revelation, and interpretation (1 Cor. 14:26). That’s nothing more than the confusion of paganism that has engulfed the church.
The Chaotic Worship of the Corinthians
The mystery religions of Babylon, which dominated the Corinthian culture during Paul’s day, had developed all kinds of rites, rituals, vows, baptisms, animal sacrifices, feasts, fasts, ablutions for sin (like dunking in a frozen river or crawling on bleeding knees for miles), ecstatic speeches, visions, and prophecies. And all of it had entered, to one degree or another, into the Corinthian church, causing absolute chaos. Do you know that people were actually standing up cursing Jesus in tongues, and people were saying, “Oh, it must be the Holy Spirit”? That’s why Paul had to write and tell them that “no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed” (1 Cor. 12:3). Their worship was total confusion. “The wild frenzy of the Greek paganism became madness in the Corinthian church,” says one writer. “And they, like the pagans, no doubt uttered their ecstatic speech with foaming lips and streaming hair.”
Beloved friend, as much as I wish it weren’t true, I’m convinced that what we see going on in today’s Charismatic movement is the same kind of situation that occurred in the Corinthian church–an engulfing of the church in pagan religion. We speak in some babble, we have ecstasy of what you call now “outpour of the spirit”, we vibrate like pagers (just as hindu’s do in their worship) and our services have become nothing short of madness! That which is counterfeit has been accepted as reality because it impacts the emotions of people who sat, for a long time, in churches where they never got anything that changed their lives.
Let’s begin our look, now, at 1 Corinthians 14. I’m going to divide the chapter into three parts: The Position of the Gift of Tongues–Secondary (vv. 1-19), The Purpose of the Gift of Tongues–A Sign (vv. 20-25), and The Procedure of the Gift of Tongues–Systematic (vv. 26-40).
THE POSITION OF THE GIFT OF TONGUES: SECONDARY (vv. 1-19)
In the first nineteen verses of 1 Corinthians 14, Paul establishes that the position of the gift of tongues is secondary relative to the other gifts–specifically, the gift of prophecy. He gives three reasons to support this. Let’s look at the first one:
Prophecy Edifies The Entire Congregation (vv. 1-5)
The gift of tongues is secondary to the gift of prophecy because tongues cannot edify and prophecy can. You say, “So what!” Well, what is the purpose of the church when it meets together? Its purpose is edification. At the end of 14:26 Paul says, “…Let all things be done unto edifying.” At the end of 14:12 Paul tells the Corinthians to “seek that ye may excel to the edifying of the church.” In other words, the purpose of the church when it meets together is edification. Throughout chapter 14 this same concept is repeated over and over again. For example, verse 4 says, “…he that prophesieth edifieth the church.” Verse 5 says, “…that the church may receive edifying.” Verse 31 says, “…all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted.” The point is this: The church is to come together for edification–to be built up. So Paul says, “Look, tongues cannot edify–especially the counterfeit kind that you have. But prophecy edifies the whole congregation.” That’s the basic proposition of the first five verses.
THE PURSUIT OF PROPHECY (v. 1)
“Follow after love, and desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy.”
“Follow after love…”
This phrase is really the end of chapter 13, isn’t it? Paul’s really saying, “I’ve just told you about love–the greatest thing there is. That’s what you ought to chase.” In 12:31, which is best translated as an indicative because of the context, Paul is actually saying to the Corinthians, “You’re coveting the showy gifts, but I show you a more excellent way. You’re busy chasing the ego-building, up- front, dramatic gifts, but I want to show you a better way– seek love.” Then he gives them a great statement on love in chapter 13, which is almost parenthetical. In 14:1, he picks up where he left off in chapter 12 and says, “Now, if you’re going to earnestly seek something, then earnestly seek love.”
The phrase “follow after” is the Greek word dioko, which means “to chase, to run after, to pursue.” Oftentimes it is translated “to persecute.” It is to be so vehement, so excited, and so energized, that you literally persecute it and dog its steps. So Paul says, “If you’re going to chase, follow, or run after something, let it be love. But at the same time…
“…and desire spiritual gifts…”
Literally it says, “…but continue desiring spirituals….” The word “desire,” because of the context, should be translated as a continuous imperative. And the word translated “and” (Gk. de), would be better translated “but,” as a contrast rather than a statement of equivalent ideas. In other words, Paul is saying, “You are pursuing the showy gifts instead of pursuing love. But don’t stop pursuing spiritual gifts, because you should want the ministry of the Holy Spirit through the gifts of the Spirit. I’m not saying don’t have anything to do with gifts. I’m just saying to pursue love and continue to seek the spiritual realm, the realm of the operation of the Holy Spirit, the true things that the Spirit of God is doing.”
“…but rather [lit. `most of all’] that ye may prophesy.”
You see, tongues are secondary. Paul is saying, “When you come together to worship, instead of having the chaos, confusion, and gibberish of tongues, you should have the clarity of prophecy.”
The verb “to prophesy” in the Greek is propheteuo. It comes from the two words pro, which means “before,” and phemi, which means “to speak.” Literally, then, the verb propheteuo means “to speak before.” To prophesy is to speak before somebody else. That’s what I do every Sunday from the pulpit–prophesy. You say, “I thought to prophesy meant to predict the future.” No. The idea of predicting the future never came along until the Middle Ages when the English word took on that meaning. That isn’t its intention in the Greek. Propheteuo simply means “to speak before somebody.” So Paul says, “Instead of everybody shouting at the same time in ecstatic gibberish, somebody ought to stand up before everybody else and speak the Word of God.” You see, that’s what ought to be going on. The speaking of those who speak the voice of God ought to take the place of the chaos and confusion of tongues.
Now, there were times in the early church when the gift of prophecy was revelatory. And there were also times when the gift involved reiterating revelation that had already been given. But the point that I want to make here is that the church is to come together to hear the Word of God spoken– not to hear an ecstatic and emotional free-for-all. All things are to be done to edify. We are to gather to hear God speak to us through men who have been given the gift of preaching and teaching. So Paul says, “More than seeking tongues, you should seek that which is intelligible– prophecy.”
The obvious reason for the inferiority of tongues is that nobody could understand what was being said. The only time the gift of tongues was ever to be used was when there was somebody present who could understand what was being said, or when there was a connection to be made to Pentecost (such as in the repeated occasions in Acts). The gift of tongues was a sign gift, and was never intended for edification. In fact, tongues were useless to edify the church by themselves. Edification could only come when tongues were interpreted by someone who understood what was being said or by someone with the gift of interpretation. However, its purpose was not edification. Its purpose was as a sign to show that God was speaking and that the prophets and Apostles of the New Testament were truly representatives of the voice of God since Bibles were not around.
THE PERVERSION OF TONGUES (v. 2)
“For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God [lit. `a god’]; for no man understandeth him; however, in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.”
The Principal Purpose Violated
What Paul is saying is this: “You people with your pagan ecstasies are not doing what all spiritual gifts were given to do–minister (or speak) to men. Rather, you are all wrapped up in speaking pagan mysteries in ecstatic speech to a god. Nobody can even understand what you’re saying!” Paul’s not referring to the mysteries (Gk. musterion) of God or the mysteries that he taught, he’s referring to the mysteries of paganism.
Now let me give you a basic, bottom-line truth: All spiritual gifts are given for the purpose of ministering (or speaking) to men. No spiritual gift was ever given for the purpose of ministering to God. All spiritual gifts are given to build up the body of Christ by ministering to the members of the body. God doesn’t need us to minister a spiritual gift to Him–He’s not incomplete! So Paul is saying, “You have fallen down on the basic use of spiritual gifts–their use among men to build up the body. The tongues speaking that you are involved in, however, is not for men, it’s for a god.”
By the way, the word “God” does not have an article in the Greek (the anarthrous construction). And because of the context, I think it’s better translated “a god” rather than referring to the true God. In other words, they were involved in ecstatic communication with some pagan god, and speaking in pagan mysteries. And they were violating the principal purpose of spiritual gifts–the fact that they are to be ministered to other people in the body of Christ. God certainly didn’t need them to talk to Him in some ecstatic gibberish!
The Private Prayer Language Condemned
It’s amazing to me that the modern Charismatic movement is simply repeating the same error that the Corinthian church was involved in. Charismatics teach that the essential use of tongues is as a private prayer language to God. Well, that is exactly what Paul is condemning here in this passage. Paul is saying, “You’ve missed the point of the true gift of tongues. This gift was designed to speak to men, like all the other gifts. But you are involved in some kind of communion with a pagan god speaking in pagan mysteries, and nobody knows what you’re saying. God certainly doesn’t want to be talked to like that.”
Is there biblical evidence for a private prayer language?
It was never God’s intention to be addressed in a language that is incomprehensible to the speaker. I believe the Bible supports this. If you were to examine every prayer prayed in the Bible, and if you were to study every passage in the Bible which taught about prayer, you would not find anything, anywhere, anytime that even suggests that prayer should ever be unintelligible. You’ll never find it. In fact, Jesus said the exact opposite. In Matthew 6:7 Jesus said, “But when ye pray, use not vain [or `meaningless’] repetitions, as the pagans do….” The phrase “vain repititions” is the Greek word battalogeo. The verb logeo means “to speak,” and the prefix batta is not even a word. It is a figure of speech that in English we call an onomatopoeia–the naming of something by a vocal imitation of the sound it makes. For example, we say that a bee goes buzz, or a zipper goes zip, or a plane goes whish. Those aren’t words, they’re onomatopoetic figures of speech. Well, batta isn’t a word either. What Jesus is literally saying in Matthew 6:7 is, “When you pray, don’t say batta, batta, batta–the sound of the stammering, stuttering gibberish that the pagans offer to their gods. The Father isn’t interested in that kind of communication.” So, we are to pray intelligibly and “with the understanding” (1 Cor. 14:15).
When Jesus went into the Garden to pray to the Father, He didn’t talk in some heavenly language. Why should you? When deity communed with deity, it was in a language that was clear. When Jesus stood by the grave of Lazarus, He prayed before He raised him from the dead. John heard every word of that prayer and wrote it down just the way He said it–clear and intelligible. John 17 is the intimate prayer between Jesus and the Father. It’s all very clear–translated beautifully into English from the original language. The point is this: There is no biblical evidence whatsoever of a private prayer language! We are to pray in an intelligible, understandable way.
The carnal Corinthians (like current Charismatics, I’m afraid), with their desire for the showy, attention-getting, ego-building, emotionalistic gift of tongues, were using it as a badge of spirituality and saying, “Oh, I have reached such a spiritual plateau that I can now talk to the eternal God in my own private language.” That is pure paganism! So Paul writes to them and says, “You have missed the whole point of the use of the true gift of tongues. You’re supposed to speak to men with the true gift, but you’re speaking to a god in mysteries.” By the way, it was believed that these “mysteries” were hidden secrets that only the initiated could know. It was also believed that these mysteries were received from the god that they connected up with when they went into an ecstatic trance. They had really missed the point of the true gift of tongues!
THE PRODUCTS OF PROPHECY (v. 3)
“But he that prophesieth speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort.”
Paul says, “When you come together, don’t seek to speak in an unknown tongue that no one even understands. Rather, seek to prophesy.” Then he lists three things that will happen when the Word of God is spoken: People will be built up, people will be encouraged to a new kind of behavior, and people will be comforted in their agonies and their hurts. Instead of coming together and saying, “Batta, batta, batta,” they were to hear the proclamation of the Word of God.
THE PROSTITUTION OF TONGUES (v. 4)
“He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself, but he that prophesieth edifieth the church.”
Now, which is better? To edify oneself, or to edify the church? Well, what’s the point of the whole chapter? The point of the entire chapter is the edification of the church, not edifying yourself! Listen, beloved, we were not given spiritual gifts for ourselves. If a person takes a spiritual gift, however, and uses it to edify himself, he has prostituted the gift. Why? Because it’s for others. It’s only to be used to build up the body of Christ.
The Inability of Tongues to Edify the Church
You say, “John, it says in verse 4 that you can speak in an unknown tongue and edify yourself.” Well, the point is that it doesn’t edify the church. You say, “But if the tongues are translated, they edify the church, don’t they?” Yes, but it was the gift of interpretation that edified, not the gift of tongues. The gift of tongues was useless to edify the church, because nobody knew what was being said. You see, even if the real gift was used, it wouldn’t edify anybody by itself. It would always have to be translated first. That’s what he says at the end of verse 5: “…except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.”
It’s wonderful to know that when the true gift of tongues was used as a sign and other Christians were present, God would always have somebody there with the gift of interpretation to interpret what was being said. Why? So that it would not go without meaning to the church. God gave the gift of interpretation so that the church would be edified. You see, God never wanted anything going on in the church that didn’t edify and build up. The Corinthians, however, were using the gift in a very chaotic way. Not only that, they had determined that it would edify the church all by itself. Well, it won’t!
The Issue of Tongues Edifying Oneself
The Corinthians’ use of the gift of tongues for personal edification was a second perversion. First of all, they had perverted the fact that spiritual gifts are meant for men, not God. Second, they had perverted the fact that spiritual gifts are meant for others, not for yourself. This same perversion is still going on today in the Charismatic movement.
Donald Gee, a well-known Charismatic, wrote the following statement: “…the revealed purposes of the gift of tongues are chiefly devotional, and we do well to emphasize the fact” (Concerning Spiritual Gifts [Springfield: Gospel Publishing House, 1937], p. 59). Another Charismatic, Larry Christenson, wrote, “One speaks in tongues, for the most part, in his private devotions. This is by far its most important use and value” (Speaking in Tongues and Its Significance for the Church [Minneapolis: Bethany Fellowship, 1968], p. 28). Now that is the very opposite of what Paul is saying here in 1 Corinthians. He is saying, “Your gift is not to speak to God, and it’s not for you. Your gift is for others in the body. So, if you seek to edify God, or yourself, you’re out of line.”
When Paul says, “He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself,” it’s possible that he’s being sarcastic. So far in this epistle, Paul has already dealt with the whole idea of self-edification in a rather pointed way. For example:
1) 1 Corinthians 8:10-11–In this chapter, Paul is telling the Corinthians, “It’s not wrong to eat meat offered to idols. But because there are some weak Christians who think it’s wrong, don’t do it–or you’ll make them stumble.” In verses 10-11 he says, “For if any man see thee, who hast knowledge [i.e., you’re a mature Christian], sitting at the table in the idol’s temple [eating the idol’s meat], shall not the conscience of him who is weak be emboldened [Gk. oikodomeo=`built up, edified’] to eat those things which are offered to idols, and through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish…?” In other words, it is possible to edify someone to his harm. In this case, edification would cause a weaker brother ruin.
So, edification can be for good or for bad. In chapter 14, the point is that if you use a gift to build up the church, it’s for good. If you use the gift just to build yourself up, it’s an act of selfishness…and that’s bad. The word edify, then, can be for good or for bad, so you have to find some qualifying principles.
2) 1 Corinthians 10:23-24–Paul says, “All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient; all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not.” Edify who? Well, look at verse 24, “Let no man seek his own [edification], but every man another’s [edification].” Do you see the point? Paul is saying, “All things might be okay for you, but don’t do them because they’re okay for you– do them because they’re going to mean something to somebody else.” That’s the point of all spiritual gifts. They’re not for God and they’re not for you, they’re for the church. So Paul says, “When you come together, instead of everybody seeking his own edification, seek to love one another.” Why? Because love “seeketh not its own” (1 Cor. 13:5). Gifts are not supposed to be directed to God, and they are not for self-edification.
What is Paul saying here in 1 Corinthians 14? He’s telling them, “Tongues can’t edify the church. Furthermore, if you have the true gift of tongues and you use it on your own for self-edification, you’re misusing the gift. Use it for what God intended. Otherwise, even if you were able to speak with the tongues of men and of angels, if you are seeking your own edification, you don’t have love. And without love, you’re nothing more than sounding brass and a tinkling cymbal.”
THE PLACE OF TONGUES (v. 5)
Now finally in this section, Paul balances his strong words on the secondary nature and the uselessness of tongues to edify, by acknowledging that there was a true gift of tongues and that it did have a true place.
The Emphasis of Hyperbole (v. 5a)
“I would that ye all spoke with tongues…”
You say, “Why did Paul say that?” Well, the Charismatics interpret it to say that Paul wanted everyone to speak in tongues. However, we have to take this statement of Paul’s in light of other passages here in 1 Corinthians. For example, in 12:30 Paul says, “Have all the gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret?” What’s the answer implied by the Greek construction? No! And in 12:11 he says, “But all these [gifts] worketh that one and the very same Spirit, dividing to every man severally as He will.” You say, “Why does Paul say, `I wish you all spoke in tongues,’ if he knows they can’t?” Well, I believe that he is talking in hyperbole. Let me show you why.
In 1 Corinthians 7:1-6, Paul talks about marriage as a good thing. Then in verse 7 he says, “For I would that all men were even as I myself….” In other words, “I wish you were all single.” Now is that an actual divine mandate? No. That’s wishing the impossible for the sake of emphasis– which is exactly what Paul is doing in 1 Corinthians 14. He’s saying, “Hey, I’m not downplaying the gift of tongues. I wish that everybody could have the real gift. But we know, of course, that that isn’t possible.” You see, Paul is using hyperbole as an emphasis. He’s balancing off his strong words denying the primacy of tongues to emphasize the fact that there is a true gift.
The Excellence of Prophecy (v. 5b)
“…but rather that ye prophesied; for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.”
Paul says, “If I had my way it would be fine if everybody spoke in tongues; but if everybody was a proclaimer with the gift of prophecy, that would be even better!” But that isn’t going to happen either, is it? Now, why does Paul say that prophesying is greater than speaking in tongues? Because unless tongues are interpreted, they don’t do any good to the church.
In fact, those people who think they have a great thing going with a private prayer language, are severely mistaken. A private prayer language won’t do anybody any good for the same reason that it won’t do the church any good–there’s no knowledge of what’s being said. Consequently there’s no learning in the mind, and it’s nothing more than sensual ecstasy, a feeling, an emotion. Christianity, beloved, has never been predicated on a feeling…never!
Well, what does all of this say to us in our day? Basically, two things. First of all, when the church comes together it is to come together to hear the Word of God. Second, we need to be careful to prevent pagan religious forms to infiltrate the truth of God’s pure church.
There’s an interesting little footnote here. Notice in verse 2 and in verse 4 where it says “tongue,” that the King James translators put the word “unknown” preceding it. However, notice that in verse 5 where it says “tongues,” the word unknown isn’t there. Do you know why? It seems that the translators put the word unknown in with the singular word tongue and left it out with the plural word tongues. It’s possible that they did this because they believed that Paul was using the singular to refer to the ecstatic gibberish (which was all one kind–gibberish) and the plural to refer to the true gift (which would have been responsible for many languages [cf. Ac. 2:6]). So in verses 1-4 he’s saying, “Your false gift is all wrong.” But in verse 5 he’s saying, “The true gift is all right when it’s used properly and interpreted.”
Beloved friend, be constantly on guard against the infiltration of paganism into the church, because Satan hasn’t changed his tactics. I pray that you have a better understanding on the subject of the true gift of languages and the pagan babble. And remember, it’s a dangerous thing to seek something that God is not giving, because then you’re wide open to Satan’s counterfeit.
All Glory to God!
Ps. Inserts from Dr. John MacArthur.
Excellent article for further study.
Posted on July 28, 2010, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 8 Comments.
Best teaching on tongues ever given, for everyone to understand the true Gift from God. Thank you Laire Lightner and John MacArthur. This just settled the matter finally for me, and I’m tired of being treated in a condescending way, “because I don’t have the Holy Spirit, because I don’t speak in tongues.” Besides I never felt that the message of Love works together with the message of tongues! Love does not seek it’s own. In other words, love does not need to edify itself. So having a secret prayer language contradict the whole message of love. Thank you again. In His Grace and Truth, Pia
Blessings sister! ❤
I wrote a similar one here http://omarcarter.com/2010/09/21/gift-of-tongues-languages-vs-gibberish/
Pretty great read
This is a great article, thank you! All the time when I read this I was thinking: It all comes down to 1 Cor 13:5, Love does not seek its own. All gifts of the Spirit are FROM God, not TO God. So in short: everytime something gets confused IT IS NOT OF GOD! Amen!
Thanks sis!!! Love you!
Thank you so much for this excellent study. I have been saved for almost 60 years, but have struggled at times with tongues. I had never thought much about it until two very close friends began telling me to pray for the gift of tongues over 25 years ago. Now, I am quite sure that both of these were saved as they certainly did love the Lord. However, they attended a different chruch than I did. I was attending a non-denominational Bible teaching church. My response to them was that I was not inclined to pray for a particular gift for the Lord knows that I am open to whatever He has for me. My gift has been teaching and I have done that, and probably will again.
I finally went to my Pastor to ask him his opinion. He agreed with what you have said here, but did tell me that he once saw what he knew was the true gift of tongues. He had preached a very basic salvation message. After he preached, a woman stood up and began speaking. The Pastor was not sure what was going on until she was finished. Then, came to find out that l little German Jewish man was in the congregation. She had repeated the salvation message in perfect German; a language which she did not speak or understand, but that he did! His English was not that good and he was having a difficult time understanding until she delivered the message in HIS language!
You have certainly made clear to me what the so-called “gift of tongues” as practiced in so many churches today really is. Thank you and God bless.
Thanks sweet friend! May the Lord bless you!